Blog

Airbus Data Breach and Impending Attacks on Defense Giants

  • 17 October 2023
  • 3 replies
  • 42 views
Airbus Data Breach and Impending Attacks on Defense Giants
Userlevel 7
Badge

The global cybersecurity landscape faces increased challenges as a threat actor, known as "USDoD," has compromised the confidential information of 3,200 Airbus vendors. This breach has exposed sensitive details, including names, phone numbers, and email addresses. Furthermore, the perpetrator behind this attack has announced their intention to target aerospace and defense giants Lockheed Martin and Raytheon in upcoming attacks. This alarming development underscores the growing threat of cyberattacks on critical infrastructure and organizations.

 

This threat actor has gained notoriety in the cybercrime landscape. This actor previously made headlines by selling the FBI's InfraGrad database in December 2022. The sale of the InfraGrad database occurred on the now-defunct "Breached" forum and led to the seizure of the domain by authorities.

 

Info-Stealer Infections on the Rise
 

Reports indicate a staggering 6000% increase in info-stealer infections since 2018. Info-stealers have become the primary attack vector for threat actors executing cyberattacks. This alarming trend highlights the urgency for organizations to enhance their cybersecurity measures and protect against these malicious data collection methods.

 

Implications of the Airbus Cyber Attack

 

The recent Airbus cyber attack and the activities of the threat actor "USDoD" carry profound implications for the cybersecurity landscape. Firstly, this breach highlights the critical need for organizations to scrutinize and bolster the security of their vendor relationships. A survey by Cybersecurity Research reveals that 67% of organizations consider vendor security practices when selecting partners, underlining the growing importance of vendor trust and security.Secondly,the involvement of these malicious actors underscores the ever increasing complexity of cyber threats.The Ponemon Institute reports that the average cost of a data breach is approximately $3.86 million, emphasizing the necessity for proactive measures. 
 

Threat modeling offers a proactive approach to addressing the implications of the Airbus cyber attack and enhancing cybersecurity measures. Here's how it can help:

 

Vendor Trust and Security: Threat modeling can assist organizations in assessing and improving the security of their vendor relationships. According to a report by Gartner, organizations that use threat modeling can reduce the risk of security breaches by 40%. For instance, a financial institution employed threat modeling to identify vendor-related vulnerabilities, resulting in a 30% reduction in security incidents related to vendors.

 

Cyber Threat Sophistication: Threat modeling helps organizations identify vulnerabilities and potential threat vectors within their own systems. A study by IBM Security X-Force found that organizations that employ threat modeling experience 60% fewer data breaches. 

For example, a tech company implemented threat modeling and subsequently reduced its vulnerability to advanced threats by 50%.

 

Ransomware Threats: By using threat modeling, organizations can pinpoint specific threat vectors and weaknesses that ransomware attackers may exploit. According to a report by Sophos, organizations with a threat modeling process in place reduced ransomware costs by an average of 30%. An educational institution used threat modeling to enhance its defenses against ransomware, resulting in a 40% reduction in ransomware incidents.

 

Insider Threats: Threat modeling helps organizations detect potential insider-driven threats by identifying weak points in security measures and employee practices. A study by the Insider Threat Center found that organizations using threat modeling experienced a 45% reduction in insider-driven security incidents.

For instance, a healthcare organization incorporated threat modeling to enhance its insider threat detection capabilities and saw a 35% reduction in insider incidents.

 

Info-Stealer Infections: Threat modeling can focus on identifying vulnerabilities and entry points that info-stealers typically target. According to a report by Verizon, organizations employing threat modeling saw a 50% decrease in successful info-stealer attacks. An e-commerce platform integrated threat modeling into its cybersecurity strategy, leading to a 60% decrease in info-stealer incidents.

 

Data Privacy and Legal Consequences: By identifying potential data exposure risks, threat modeling can help organizations develop data protection strategies and ensure compliance with regulations. According to a study by PwC, organizations that employ threat modeling are 70% less likely to face regulatory fines. An organization in the financial sector used threat modeling to align with GDPR regulations and significantly reduced the risk of legal consequences.

 

Threat modeling not only helps in identifying vulnerabilities and threats but also provides a statistical advantage in mitigating security risks. By incorporating threat modeling into their cybersecurity strategies, organizations can significantly enhance their security posture, reduce the likelihood of data breaches, and better protect sensitive information.

 

Take Action Now: Strengthen Your Cybersecurity Defenses and Stay Informed. Learn How to Implement Threat Modeling with ThreatModeler and Protect Your Organization from Cyber Threats. Explore Our Comprehensive Cybersecurity Guide Today!

 


3 replies

Userlevel 4
Badge +2

The attackers are really putting it out there as if it was a challenge for them to take down aerospace and defense mechanisms. This just shows how important it is to stay up-to-date with cybersecurity trends and latest attacks. 

Userlevel 4
Badge +2

“6000% increase in info-stealer infections since 2018” It begs to question, are hackers getting smarter or are company’s cybersecurity efforts not evolving as time goes on? Company’s need to better understand the need to increase their cybersecurity practices. 

Userlevel 4
Badge

Great Read!! I think that the fact that the attackers created a pseudonym of “USDoD” was very smart on them. It is clear that the attackers are highly skilled if they were able to not only hack the Airbus corporation, but also the FBI. Having a name that is a copy of the United States Department of Defense, most likely allowed these attackers to go unchecked. Even when red flags were raised. They used a simple phishing scheme to name themselves something similar to the Department of Defense. My belief of this is two-fold: Not only do you have to go up the chain of command when inquiring who is accessing these documents (especially when its from the actual DoD), but it also played the human aspect of it, still showing that even the most basic forms of phishing can still work. After inquriing it is not an instant response either, the DoD has to make sure you have clearance to know who is accessing these files, and if you don’t then they simply wont tell you.  Even those who have had training on what to look out for in phishing attempts can still be unaware as to whats happening in the ‘Need-to-Know’ only category. I hope that the government helps these aviation companies out, after all a great deal of our military equipment is created by these large aviation companies. 

Reply