Safeguarding Critical Assets from Cyber Threats: Guarding Against APT29

  • 11 September 2023
  • 2 replies
Safeguarding Critical Assets from Cyber Threats: Guarding Against APT29
Userlevel 7

The problem here is  a series of cyberattacks orchestrated by a state-sponsored threat actor known as APT29. APT stands for Advanced Persistent Threat, and APT29 is one of the more notorious APT groups, often associated with Russian intelligence agencies. The specific focus of these attacks is on ministries of foreign affairs in countries that are members of NATO, a military alliance of North American and European nations.


This Campaign is Characterized by Several Concerning Aspects

Attribution to a state actor

The attacks are attributed to APT29, which has been associated with Russian intelligence agencies. State-sponsored threat actors often have significant resources and sophisticated tactics at their disposal.

Phishing campaign

The threat actors use phishing emails with PDF attachments as lures. These phishing attempts target high-value individuals within government organizations.

Malware deployment

The attackers deliver a variant of the Duke malware, which is known for its stealth and persistence capabilities. Once deployed, this malware can provide unauthorized access to compromised networks.

Use of legitimate services

APT29 leverages legitimate services like Zulip for command and control (C2), making it challenging for defenders to differentiate malicious activity from legitimate traffic.

Possible espionage

The primary targets are ministries of foreign affairs, which handle sensitive diplomatic information. This suggests that the attackers may be interested in espionage or gaining a strategic advantage through information gathering.

Geopolitical implications

Such attacks on government institutions can have significant geopolitical implications, including strained international relations and diplomatic tensions

How Threat Modeling can Help

Threat modeling can help address this problem by taking a proactive and structured approach to enhance the security posture of the targeted organizations. Threat modeling provides the following benefits:

Asset identification

Identify the critical assets that need protection, such as diplomatic correspondence, confidential documents, and communication channels.

Threat actor analysis

Analyze the capabilities, motivations, and tactics of APT29. Understanding the threat actor's modus operandi is crucial for designing effective defenses.

Vulnerability assessment

Assess vulnerabilities in the targeted organizations, including weaknesses in email security, endpoint protection, and user awareness.

Risk assessment

Evaluate the potential impact of a successful attack, considering the sensitivity of the data at risk and the consequences of data compromise.

Mitigation planning

Can facilitate email filtering, which can block 99.9% of spam and phishing emails and network segmentation, which can reduce the attack surface.Training employees in cybersecurity also can reduce the likelihood of falling victim to phishing attacks by up to 70%.

Security by design

Implementing security by design principles can reduce the number of vulnerabilities in systems.

According to Gartner, by 2025, 60% of organizations will have implemented security by design in at least 40% of their development projects.

Monitoring and detection

47% of cyberattacks are detected by external parties, not the victim organization.The use of legitimate services for malicious purposes can be detected by analyzing network traffic patterns.

Incident response

Develop and test an incident response plan tailored to address sophisticated threats like APT29. Ensure that the plan includes communication and coordination with relevant authorities.

Regular updates

Continuously update the threat model as the threat landscape evolves, and adjust security measures accordingly. 


Collaborate with international partners, such as NATO and other affected countries, to share threat intelligence and enhance collective defense against state-sponsored threats.


Threat modeling can help organizations anticipate, prepare for, and respond to advanced and persistent threats like those posed by state-sponsored actors. It promotes a proactive and holistic approach to cybersecurity, reducing the likelihood of successful attacks and their potentially severe consequences.


Learn how to defend against APT29 and similar threats. Act today to protect your critical assets and data.


2 replies

Userlevel 4
Badge +2

State-sponsored actors and their activities are usually backed by a government and targeted towards governments of other countries which is quite scary as they have all the resources and power to conduct the cyber attacks. It also gets harder for defenders to figure out the source of the attacks because state-sponsored actors usually do not take the credits for the attacks and are good at erasing any footprints they leave behind. 

Userlevel 2

The APT29 cyberattacks, linked to Russian intelligence, pose grave threats with their state-sponsored resources. Their use of phishing, stealthy malware, and legitimate services for espionage against foreign affairs ministries carries serious geopolitical ramifications, potentially straining international relations.